- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QF81 vs M1X
Acer QF81 vs ViewSonic M1X
What QF81 does better (2) and where M1X wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is QF81 better than M1X?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Why is M1X better than QF81?
- Light source life800 h vs 60,000 h75×
- HDMI inputs0 vs 1
- Audio outputNo · QF81: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 800 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 120,000:1 |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | — | 24″ |
| Largest image size | — | 100″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 16 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 0 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | — | Yes |
| Light source life | 800 h | 60,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 25 dB |
| Weight | — | 0.8 kg |
| Width | — | 166 mm |
| Height | — | 54 mm |
| Depth | — | 138 mm |
| Colours | White | Black |
