- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QF81 vs M1XG
Acer QF81 vs ViewSonic M1XG
What QF81 does better (2) and where M1XG wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is QF81 better than M1XG?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)800 lm vs 360 lm2.2×
- Wi-FiYes · M1XG: No
Why is M1XG better than QF81?
M1XG has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 800 lm | 360 lm |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 2:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 4.43 m |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 0 | 0 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 800 h | 800 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | White | Black |
