- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- EAZZE D1G vs FLIK HD9
Aurzen EAZZE D1G vs Kodak FLIK HD9
What EAZZE D1G does better (4) and where FLIK HD9 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is EAZZE D1G better than FLIK HD9?
- Automatic keystone correctionYes · FLIK HD9: No
- Audio outputYes · FLIK HD9: No
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,200:1 vs 800:1+50%
- Largest image size200″ vs 150″+33%
Why is FLIK HD9 better than EAZZE D1G?
FLIK HD9 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K input only (downscaled) | — |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,200:1 | 800:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | 50″ | — |
| Largest image size | 200″ | 150″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 16 W | — |
| Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital Plus | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Google TV | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | Yes | — |
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant | Google Assistant |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 40 dB | — |
| Colours | White | — |
