How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. EAZZE D1G vs FLIK X10

Aurzen EAZZE D1G vs Kodak FLIK X10

What EAZZE D1G does better (4) and where FLIK X10 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Aurzen EAZZE D1G
Aurzen · 2025EAZZE D1G
4.9Score
4 advantages≈ US$230
Higher score
vs
Kodak FLIK X10
Kodak · 2025FLIK X10
0 advantages≈ US$240
8.1Setup & placement5.2

Why is EAZZE D1G better than FLIK X10?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionYes · FLIK X10: No
  2. Audio outputYes · FLIK X10: No
  3. Largest image size200″ vs 120″+67%
  4. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,200:1 vs 800:1+50%

Why is FLIK X10 better than EAZZE D1G?

FLIK X10 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Aurzen EAZZE D1GAurzen EAZZE D1G≈ US$2304.9
Kodak FLIK X10Kodak FLIK X10≈ US$240
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K input only (downscaled)—
Display technologyLCD (single panel)—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm—
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)—3,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,200:1800:1
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.3:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.88 m
Smallest image size50″40″
Largest image size200″120″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYesYes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)16 W—
Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital PlusYes—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TV—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Chromecast built-inYes—
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesNo
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life—20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise40 dB—
ColoursWhite—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare