- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- ZIP Tri-Fold vs Lifestudio Flex EF-72
Aurzen ZIP Tri-Fold vs Epson Lifestudio Flex EF-72
What ZIP Tri-Fold does better (0) and where Lifestudio Flex EF-72 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is ZIP Tri-Fold better than Lifestudio Flex EF-72?
ZIP Tri-Fold has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Lifestudio Flex EF-72 better than ZIP Tri-Fold?
- HDMI inputs0 vs 1
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | DLP | 3LCD |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 1,000 lm |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 5,000 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 5,000,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10, HLG |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | — | 30″ |
| Largest image size | — | 150″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 0 | 1 |
| HDMI eARC | — | Yes |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 5,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 28 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 22 dB |
| Colours | Gold | Brown |
Related comparisons
vs
Aurzen ZIP Tri-FoldvsXGIMI MoGo
vs
Aurzen ZIP Tri-FoldvsKodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
vs
Samsung The Freestyle+vsAurzen ZIP Tri-Fold
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-61vsEpson Lifestudio Flex EF-72
8.79.7
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-62vsEpson Lifestudio Flex EF-72
8.99.7
vs
Xiaomi Vali 1vsEpson Lifestudio Flex EF-72
9.39.7