How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. ZIP Tri-Fold vs The Freestyle+

Aurzen ZIP Tri-Fold vs Samsung The Freestyle+

What ZIP Tri-Fold does better (0) and where The Freestyle+ wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Aurzen ZIP Tri-Fold
Aurzen · 2026ZIP Tri-Fold
0 advantages≈ US$1,000
vs
Samsung The Freestyle+
Samsung · 2026The Freestyle+
6.1Score
2 advantages≈ US$920
Higher score

Why is ZIP Tri-Fold better than The Freestyle+?

ZIP Tri-Fold has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is The Freestyle+ better than ZIP Tri-Fold?

  1. Light source life5,000 h vs 20,000 h4×
  2. HDMI inputs0 vs 1
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light source—LED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—430 lm
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)5,000 lm—
HDR support—Yes
HDR formats—HDR10+, HDR10, HLG
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.66 m
Smallest image size—30″
Largest image size—100″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—5 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)Tizen (Samsung)
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth—Yes
AirPlay—Yes
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa, Bixby
Connectivity
HDMI inputs01
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—100 W
Light source life5,000 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—30 dB
Weight—1 kg
Width—106 mm
Height—177 mm
Depth—99 mm
ColoursGoldWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare