- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- ZIP Tri-Fold vs Luma 400 tragbarer HD
Aurzen ZIP Tri-Fold vs Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
What ZIP Tri-Fold does better (1) and where Luma 400 tragbarer HD wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is ZIP Tri-Fold better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?
- Light source life5,000 h vs 3,500 h+43%
Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than ZIP Tri-Fold?
- HDMI inputs0 vs 1
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 200 lm |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 5,000 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,500:1 |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 0 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 5,000 h | 3,500 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | Gold | Black, White |
