How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. LK835ST vs NeoPix Prime 2

BenQ LK835ST vs Philips NeoPix Prime 2

What LK835ST does better (5) and where NeoPix Prime 2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

BenQ LK835ST
BenQ · 2022LK835ST
6.3Score
5 advantages≈ US$2,500
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix Prime 2
Philips · 2021NeoPix Prime 2
1 advantage
9.4Picture2.2

Why is LK835ST better than NeoPix Prime 2?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 180 lm22.2×
  2. Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000,000:1 vs 3,000:11,000×
  4. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
  5. Largest image size120″ vs 80″+50%

Why is NeoPix Prime 2 better than LK835ST?

  1. Weight3.4 kg vs 3 kg+13%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ LK835STBenQ LK835ST≈ US$2,5006.3
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)1280 × 720 (HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1280 × 720 (HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting—
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLaserLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm180 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000,000:13,000:1
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio0.69:11.3:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)0.83:1—
Throw typeShort throw (0.4–1.0:1)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image1.53 m2.88 m
Smallest image size60″—
Largest image size120″80″
Optical zoom1.25×—
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusYesYes
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth—Yes
Internal storage—16 GB
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoYes
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption320 W—
Light source life20,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise34 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)28 dB—
Weight3.4 kg3 kg
ColoursBlackSilver, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare