How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. TK800 vs TK800M

BenQ TK800 vs BenQ TK800M

What TK800 does better (2) and where TK800M wins (0) — every spec side by side.

BenQ TK800
BenQ · 2018TK800
4.4Score
2 advantages
Higher score
vs
BenQ TK800M
BenQ · 2019TK800M
0 advantages≈ US$840
6.2Picture6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

TK800TK800M
353 × 135272353 × 135272
TK800TK800MDifference
Height135 mm135 mm=
Width353 mm353 mm=
Depth272 mm272 mm=
Weight4.2 kg4.2 kg=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TK800 better than TK800M?

  1. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  2. Optical zoom1.2× vs 1.1×+9%

Why is TK800M better than TK800?

TK800M has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

BenQ TK800MBenQ TK800M≈ US$840
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting4K by pixel shifting
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light source—Lamp
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,000 lm3,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)10,000:1—
HDR supportYesYes
HDR formats—HDR10, HLG
3D playbackYesYes
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz—
Game / low-latency modeYesYes
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.47:11.5:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.76:11.65:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.25 m3.32 m
Smallest image size60″—
Largest image size300″—
Optical zoom1.2×1.1×
Lens shiftNone—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)5 W—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
HDMI version2—
USB portYes—
Ethernet (LAN)No—
VGA inputYesYes
Audio outputYes—
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption385 W—
Light source life4,000 h—
Light source life (eco mode)10,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise33 dB33 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)29 dB—
Weight4.2 kg4.2 kg
Width353 mm353 mm
Height135 mm135 mm
Depth272 mm272 mm
ColoursBlue, White—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare