- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- FHD5000 vs TYY0061
Celexon FHD5000 vs TopVision TYY0061
What FHD5000 does better (3) and where TYY0061 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is FHD5000 better than TYY0061?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)100,000:1 vs 12,000:18.3×
- Weight2.75 kg vs 6.9 kg2.5×
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
Why is TYY0061 better than FHD5000?
- Largest image size135″ vs 350″2.6×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | — |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | — | 9,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 100,000:1 | 12,000:1 |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.35:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.99 m | — |
| Largest image size | 135″ | 350″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 130 W | — |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 2.75 kg | 6.9 kg |
| Colours | Black, White | White |
