- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- FHD5000 vs NeoPix Prime 2
Celexon FHD5000 vs Philips NeoPix Prime 2
What FHD5000 does better (5) and where NeoPix Prime 2 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is FHD5000 better than NeoPix Prime 2?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)100,000:1 vs 3,000:133.3×
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Largest image size135″ vs 80″+69%
- Weight2.75 kg vs 3 kg+9%
Why is NeoPix Prime 2 better than FHD5000?
NeoPix Prime 2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 180 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 100,000:1 | 3,000:1 |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.35:1 | 1.3:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.99 m | 2.88 m |
| Largest image size | 135″ | 80″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 16 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 130 W | — |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 2.75 kg | 3 kg |
| Colours | Black, White | Silver, Black |
