- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- DBX3 Pro vs GT2000HDR
Dangbei DBX3 Pro vs Optoma GT2000HDR
What DBX3 Pro does better (2) and where GT2000HDR wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is DBX3 Pro better than GT2000HDR?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Automatic keystone correctionYes · GT2000HDR: No
Why is GT2000HDR better than DBX3 Pro?
- Maximum refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,200 lm vs 3,500 lm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | — | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,200 lm | 3,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 300,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HLG | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 0.5:1 |
| Throw type | — | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 1.11 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 30″ |
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | No |
| Obstacle avoidance | Yes | — |
| Automatic screen fit | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 15 W |
| Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital Plus | Yes | — |
| DTS | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | — | 2 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 139 W |
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 34 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 32 dB |
| Weight | — | 3 kg |
| Width | — | 274 mm |
| Height | — | 114 mm |
| Depth | — | 216 mm |
| Colours | — | White |
