- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- PR-4300 vs IMS360
Denver PR-4300 vs Extralink IMS360
What PR-4300 does better (3) and where IMS360 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is PR-4300 better than IMS360?
- Resolution (on screen)2560 × 1440 (QHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)400 lm vs 300 lm+33%
- Native panel resolution2560 × 1440 (QHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Why is IMS360 better than PR-4300?
IMS360 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 2560 × 1440 (QHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 2560 × 1440 (QHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 400 lm | 300 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 8,000:1 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | — |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | — |
| USB port | Yes | — |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | — |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | Yes | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 50,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | Grey, White | White |
