How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. PR-4300 vs IMC260

Denver PR-4300 vs Zenwire IMC260

What PR-4300 does better (3) and where IMC260 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Denver PR-4300
Denver · 2026PR-4300
8.4Score
3 advantages≈ US$85
Higher score
vs
Zenwire IMC260
Zenwire · 2026IMC260
1 advantage≈ US$90
8.8Picture6.4

Why is PR-4300 better than IMC260?

  1. Resolution (on screen)2560 × 1440 (QHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)400 lm vs 360 lm+11%
  3. Native panel resolution2560 × 1440 (QHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)

Why is IMC260 better than PR-4300?

  1. Wi-FiNo · PR-4300: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Denver PR-4300Denver PR-4300≈ US$858.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)2560 × 1440 (QHD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution2560 × 1440 (QHD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)400 lm360 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)8,000:1—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m—
Lens shiftNone—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-FiNoYes
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs1—
USB portYes—
Ethernet (LAN)No—
VGA inputNo—
Audio outputYes—
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life50,000 h—
Design & noise
ColoursGrey, WhiteBlue, White
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare