How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. M2 Pro vs GamePix 900

Hisense M2 Pro vs Philips GamePix 900

What M2 Pro does better (2) and where GamePix 900 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Hisense M2 Pro
Hisense · 2025M2 Pro
6.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$920
Higher score
vs
Philips GamePix 900
Philips · 2025GamePix 900
3 advantages≈ US$780
4.2Picture4.1

Why is M2 Pro better than GamePix 900?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,300 lm vs 1,000 lm+30%
  2. Largest image size200″ vs 120″+67%

Why is GamePix 900 better than M2 Pro?

  1. Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
  2. Audio outputNo · M2 Pro: Yes
  3. Weight3.5 kg vs 2.3 kg+52%
Specifications

Side by side

Hisense M2 ProHisense M2 Pro≈ US$9206.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting4K by pixel shifting
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLaserLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,300 lm1,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1—
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10+, HDR10, Dolby Vision—
Dolby VisionYes—
Motion interpolation (MEMC)Yes—
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate—120 Hz
Game / low-latency modeYes—
Lens & placement
Smallest image size65″—
Largest image size200″120″
Optical zoom1.3×—
Lens shiftNone—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)20 W—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformVIDAA—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
AirPlayYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI version2.1—
USB portYesNo
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption120 W—
Light source life20,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight3.5 kg2.3 kg
Width—238 mm
Height—115 mm
Depth—215 mm
ColoursSilver, BlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare