- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- EF-2X vs Halo+ GTV
Epson EF-2X vs XGIMI Halo+ GTV
What EF-2X does better (3) and where Halo+ GTV wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is EF-2X better than Halo+ GTV?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,000 lm vs 900 lm+11%
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)5,000,000:1 vs 200:125,000×
- Largest image size150″ vs 120″+25%
Why is Halo+ GTV better than EF-2X?
- Light source life20,000 h vs 25,000 h+25%
- Weight2.3 kg vs 1.6 kg+44%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | 3LCD | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 1,000 lm | 900 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 5,000,000:1 | 200:1 |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.82:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.21 m | 2.66 m |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | — |
| Largest image size | 150″ | 120″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 25,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 23 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 19 dB | — |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.6 kg |
| Width | 197 mm | — |
| Height | 191 mm | — |
| Depth | 113 mm | — |
| Colours | — | Grey |
