How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Xming Page Two vs M1XG

Formovie Xming Page Two vs ViewSonic M1XG

What Xming Page Two does better (4) and where M1XG wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Formovie Xming Page Two
Formovie · 2025Xming Page Two
5.7Score
4 advantages≈ US$480
vs
ViewSonic M1XG
ViewSonic · 2026M1XG
6.0Score
0 advantages≈ US$460
Higher score
7.3Picture6.4
6.8Setup & placement4.4

Why is Xming Page Two better than M1XG?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)500 lm vs 360 lm+39%
  2. Wi-FiYes · M1XG: No
  3. HDMI inputs1 vs 0
  4. Audio outputYes · M1XG: No

Why is M1XG better than Xming Page Two?

M1XG has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

ViewSonic M1XGViewSonic M1XG≈ US$4606.0
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)500 lm360 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000:1—
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10—
Motion interpolation (MEMC)Yes—
Gaming
Game / low-latency modeYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.25:12:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.77 m4.43 m
Smallest image size40″—
Largest image size120″—
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYes—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TV—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYesNo
BluetoothYesYes
Chromecast built-inYes—
Internal storage16 GB—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs10
HDMI version2.1—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption100 W—
Light source life—800 h
Design & noise
Fan noise30 dB—
Weight2 kg—
Width207 mm—
Height190 mm—
Depth127 mm—
ColoursGreyBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare