How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. QT12 vs M2 Pro

Acer QT12 vs Hisense M2 Pro

What QT12 does better (1) and where M2 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Acer QT12
Acer · 2026QT12
1 advantage
vs
Hisense M2 Pro
Hisense · 2025M2 Pro
6.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$920
Higher score
6.8Picture4.2

Why is QT12 better than M2 Pro?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 1,300 lm5×

Why is M2 Pro better than QT12?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  2. Light source life6,500 h vs 20,000 h3.1×
  3. Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications

Side by side

Hisense M2 ProHisense M2 Pro≈ US$9206.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method—4K by pixel shifting
Display technologyLCD (single panel)DLP
Light sourceLEDLaser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm1,300 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—1,000:1
HDR support—Yes
HDR formats—HDR10+, HDR10, Dolby Vision
Dolby Vision—Yes
Motion interpolation (MEMC)—Yes
Gaming
Game / low-latency mode—Yes
Lens & placement
Smallest image size—65″
Largest image size—200″
Optical zoom—1.3×
Lens shift—None
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—20 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—VIDAA
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
AirPlay—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI version—2.1
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—120 W
Light source life6,500 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—3.5 kg
ColoursWhiteSilver, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare