- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- M2TUK Pro vs CP180
Hisense M2TUK Pro vs HP CP180
What M2TUK Pro does better (3) and where CP180 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is M2TUK Pro better than CP180?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,300 lm vs 130 lm10×
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
Why is CP180 better than M2TUK Pro?
CP180 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | DLP | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | RGB triple laser | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 1,300 lm | 130 lm |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | Dolby Vision | — |
| Dolby Vision | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| HDMI version | 2.1 | — |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 120 W | — |
| Light source life | 25,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 3.9 kg | — |
| Height | 230 mm | — |
| Depth | 218 mm | — |
| Colours | Grey | White |
