- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- M2TUK Pro vs GT2200HDR
Hisense M2TUK Pro vs Optoma GT2200HDR
What M2TUK Pro does better (2) and where GT2200HDR wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is M2TUK Pro better than GT2200HDR?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- HDMI version2.1 vs 2+5%
Why is GT2200HDR better than M2TUK Pro?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,300 lm vs 3,300 lm2.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | RGB triple laser | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 1,300 lm | 3,300 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 500,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | Dolby Vision | HDR10 |
| Dolby Vision | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 2:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 4.43 m |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| HDMI version | 2.1 | 2 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 120 W | — |
| Light source life | 25,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 3.9 kg | — |
| Height | 230 mm | — |
| Depth | 218 mm | — |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
