- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- CC180W vs PV800 Pro
HP CC180W vs OSCAL PV800 Pro
What CC180W does better (1) and where PV800 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is CC180W better than PV800 Pro?
- Fan noise32 dB vs 35 dB+9%
Why is PV800 Pro better than CC180W?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Largest image size80″ vs 200″2.5×
- Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 8 W+33%
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Audio outputNo · CC180W: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | 3LCD | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 100 lm | — |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | — | 1,400 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 4,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10+, HDR10 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.35:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.99 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 45″ | 40″ |
| Largest image size | 80″ | 200″ |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 6 W | 8 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 32 dB | 35 dB |
| Weight | 0.89 kg | — |
| Width | 105 mm | — |
| Height | 162 mm | — |
| Depth | 140 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Silver, White, Grey |
