- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- CC180W vs NeoPix 113
HP CC180W vs Philips NeoPix 113
What CC180W does better (2) and where NeoPix 113 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is CC180W better than NeoPix 113?
- Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 3 W2×
- Largest image size80″ vs 65″+23%
Why is NeoPix 113 better than CC180W?
- Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
- Weight0.89 kg vs 0.4 kg2.2×
- Audio outputNo · CC180W: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | 3LCD | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 100 lm | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.35:1 | 1.47:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.99 m | 3.25 m |
| Smallest image size | 45″ | 65″ |
| Largest image size | 80″ | 65″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 6 W | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 32 dB | — |
| Weight | 0.89 kg | 0.4 kg |
| Width | 105 mm | — |
| Height | 162 mm | — |
| Depth | 140 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Black |
