How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. CC200 vs NeoPix 730

HP CC200 vs Philips NeoPix 730

What CC200 does better (0) and where NeoPix 730 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

HP CC200
HP · 2022CC200
0 advantages≈ US$130
vs
Philips NeoPix 730
Philips · 2023NeoPix 730
8.9Score
4 advantages
Higher score
Dimensions

Size comparison

CC200NeoPix 730
128 × 203136305 × 119319
CC200NeoPix 730Difference
Height203 mm119 mm+84 mm
Width128 mm305 mm−177 mm
Depth136 mm319 mm−183 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is CC200 better than NeoPix 730?

CC200 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is NeoPix 730 better than CC200?

  1. Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
  2. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  3. Audio outputNo · CC200: Yes
  4. Largest image size80″ vs 120″+50%
Specifications

Side by side

HP CC200HP CC200≈ US$130
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.4:11.65:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.1 m3.65 m
Smallest image size45″—
Largest image size80″120″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—No
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—20 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portNoYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—100 W
Light source life20,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—2.7 kg
Width128 mm305 mm
Height203 mm119 mm
Depth136 mm319 mm
ColoursYellowBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare