How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. CC200 vs VPL-XW7000ES

HP CC200 vs Sony VPL-XW7000ES

What CC200 does better (0) and where VPL-XW7000ES wins (5) — every spec side by side.

HP CC200
HP · 2022CC200
0 advantages≈ US$130
vs
Sony VPL-XW7000ES
Sony · 2022VPL-XW7000ES
8.9Score
5 advantages
Higher score
2.3Picture7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

CC200VPL-XW7000ES
128 × 203136460 × 210517
CC200VPL-XW7000ESDifference
Height203 mm210 mm−7 mm
Width128 mm460 mm−332 mm
Depth136 mm517 mm−381 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is CC200 better than VPL-XW7000ES?

CC200 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is VPL-XW7000ES better than CC200?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 3,200 lm16×
  2. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  3. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  4. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  5. Ethernet (LAN)No · CC200: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

HP CC200HP CC200≈ US$130
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
4K method—Native 4K
Display technologyLCD (single panel)LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA)
Light sourceLEDLaser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm3,200 lm
HDR support—Yes
Motion interpolation (MEMC)—Yes
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.4:11.35:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)—2.84:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.1 m2.99 m
Smallest image size45″—
Largest image size80″—
Optical zoom—2.1×
Lens shift—Vertical and horizontal
Autofocus—No
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portNoYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoYes
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—420 W
Light source life20,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise—26 dB
Weight—14 kg
Width128 mm460 mm
Height203 mm210 mm
Depth136 mm517 mm
ColoursYellow—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare