- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- CC200 vs 43BHM2251 HD
HP CC200 vs Salora 43BHM2251 HD
What CC200 does better (3) and where 43BHM2251 HD wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.3Picture2.1
Why is CC200 better than 43BHM2251 HD?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 180 lm+11%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
Why is 43BHM2251 HD better than CC200?
- Light source life20,000 h vs 50,000 h2.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 180 lm |
| HDR support | — | No |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.4:1 | 1.27:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.1 m | 2.81 m |
| Smallest image size | 45″ | — |
| Largest image size | 80″ | — |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | No | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 70 W |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 50,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 25 dB |
| Weight | — | 1.5 kg |
| Width | 128 mm | — |
| Height | 203 mm | 87 mm |
| Depth | 136 mm | 185 mm |
| Colours | Yellow | Grey |
