- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- MC425 vs Luma 400 tragbarer HD
HP MC425 vs Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
What MC425 does better (3) and where Luma 400 tragbarer HD wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Picture3.0
Why is MC425 better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Light source life20,000 h vs 3,500 h5.7×
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than MC425?
Luma 400 tragbarer HD has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Power consumption | 55 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 3,500 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 1 kg | — |
| Width | 120 mm | — |
| Height | 156 mm | — |
| Depth | 102 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Black, White |
