- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- MC425 vs HY450C
HP MC425 vs Magcubic HY450C
What MC425 does better (2) and where HY450C wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is MC425 better than HY450C?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
Why is HY450C better than MC425?
HY450C has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.66 m |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | — |
| USB port | No | — |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | — |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | No | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Power consumption | 55 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 1 kg | — |
| Width | 120 mm | — |
| Height | 156 mm | — |
| Depth | 102 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Black, Brown |
