- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- MC425 vs NeoPix 256
HP MC425 vs Philips NeoPix 256
What MC425 does better (1) and where NeoPix 256 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Picture5.2
Why is MC425 better than NeoPix 256?
- Light source life20,000 h vs 1,000 h20×
Why is NeoPix 256 better than MC425?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 250 lm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 250 lm |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Power consumption | 55 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 1,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 1 kg | — |
| Width | 120 mm | — |
| Height | 156 mm | — |
| Depth | 102 mm | — |
| Colours | White | White, Silver, Grey |
