- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- MC425 vs T1 Pro
HP MC425 vs Yaber T1 Pro
What MC425 does better (1) and where T1 Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
MC425T1 Pro
| MC425 | T1 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 156 mm | 228 mm | −72 mm |
| Width | 120 mm | 116 mm | +4 mm |
| Depth | 102 mm | 106 mm | −4 mm |
| Weight | 1 kg | 1.2 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MC425 better than T1 Pro?
- Weight1 kg vs 1.25 kg+25%
Why is T1 Pro better than MC425?
- Automatic keystone correctionNo · MC425: Yes
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 220 lm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 220 lm |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.16:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.57 m |
| Largest image size | — | 120″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 8 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Own / Linux platform |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | — |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | No | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Power consumption | 55 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 1 kg | 1.25 kg |
| Width | 120 mm | 116 mm |
| Height | 156 mm | 228 mm |
| Depth | 102 mm | 106 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
