How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. MP1080p vs NeoPix 113

iggual MP1080p vs Philips NeoPix 113

What MP1080p does better (3) and where NeoPix 113 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

iggual MP1080p
iggual · 2024MP1080p
4.8Score
3 advantages≈ US$210
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 113
Philips · 2024NeoPix 113
2 advantages≈ US$210

Why is MP1080p better than NeoPix 113?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
  2. Largest image size150″ vs 65″2.3×
  3. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)

Why is NeoPix 113 better than MP1080p?

  1. Weight0.97 kg vs 0.4 kg2.4×
  2. Audio outputNo · MP1080p: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

iggual MP1080piggual MP1080p≈ US$2104.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1280 × 720 (HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1280 × 720 (HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)300 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000:1—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.47:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—3.25 m
Smallest image size30″65″
Largest image size150″65″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)3 W3 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYes—
AirPlayYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption60 W—
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise35 dB—
Weight0.97 kg0.4 kg
Width97 mm—
Height100 mm—
Depth188 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare