- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 113 vs M10
Philips NeoPix 113 vs ViewSonic M10
What NeoPix 113 does better (3) and where M10 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is NeoPix 113 better than M10?
- Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
- Weight0.4 kg vs 1.36 kg3.4×
- Audio outputYes · M10: No
Why is M10 better than NeoPix 113?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Built-in speakers (total output)3 W vs 7 W2.3×
- Largest image size65″ vs 180″2.8×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000,000:1 |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.47:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.25 m | 2.66 m |
| Smallest image size | 65″ | 40″ |
| Largest image size | 65″ | 180″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 3 W | 7 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 16 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 51 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 29 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 26 dB |
| Weight | 0.4 kg | 1.36 kg |
| Width | — | 202 mm |
| Height | — | 92 mm |
| Depth | — | 165 mm |
| Colours | Black | Grey, Silver |
