How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Apex Challenger IN3048SL vs TX-332

InFocus Apex Challenger IN3048SL vs Technaxx TX-332

What Apex Challenger IN3048SL does better (1) and where TX-332 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

InFocus Apex Challenger IN3048SL
5.1Score
1 advantage≈ US$110
Higher score
vs
Technaxx TX-332
Technaxx · 2025TX-332
4.3Score
3 advantages≈ US$140
4.6Picture4.0
3.8Smart features & sound2.1

Why is Apex Challenger IN3048SL better than TX-332?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 3 W2×

Why is TX-332 better than Apex Challenger IN3048SL?

  1. Light source life25,000 h vs 30,000 h+20%
  2. Weight1.25 kg vs 0.8 kg+56%
  3. Largest image size100″ vs 150″+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Technaxx TX-332Technaxx TX-332≈ US$1404.3
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm200 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—1,000:1
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10, HLG—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m—
Smallest image size60″27″
Largest image size100″150″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)6 W3 W
Smart & streaming
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
AirPlay—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life25,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight1.25 kg0.8 kg
ColoursBlackWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare