- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Crusader Challenger IN3008SL vs PicoPlay
InFocus Crusader Challenger IN3008SL vs JMGO PicoPlay
What Crusader Challenger IN3008SL does better (2) and where PicoPlay wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Picture5.7
9.2Smart features & sound4.9
3.1Noise, lifetime & portability9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Crusader Challenger IN3008SLPicoPlay
| Crusader Challenger IN3008SL | PicoPlay | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 128 mm | 166 mm | −38 mm |
| Width | 147 mm | 85 mm | +62 mm |
| Depth | 130 mm | 85 mm | +45 mm |
| Weight | 1.3 kg | 0.7 kg | +0.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Crusader Challenger IN3008SL better than PicoPlay?
- Built-in speakers (total output)20 W vs 8 W2.5×
- Internal storage32 GB vs 16 GB2×
Why is PicoPlay better than Crusader Challenger IN3008SL?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)350 lm vs 400 lm+14%
- Fan noise35 dB vs 26 dB+35%
- Weight1.3 kg vs 0.73 kg+78%
- Largest image size130″ vs 200″+54%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 350 lm | 400 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 400:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10, HLG | HDR10 |
| Colour gamut (DCI-P3) | — | 90% |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | 2.66 m |
| Smallest image size | 45″ | 40″ |
| Largest image size | 130″ | 200″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic screen fit | — | Yes |
| Built-in stand / gimbal | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 20 W | 8 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Google TV | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | Yes | Yes |
| Internal storage | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI eARC | — | Yes |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | — |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | Yes | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| USB-C power input (power bank) | — | Yes |
| Power consumption | — | 65 W |
| Light source life | 25,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 35 dB | 26 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 28 dB | — |
| Weight | 1.3 kg | 0.73 kg |
| Width | 147 mm | 85 mm |
| Height | 128 mm | 166 mm |
| Depth | 130 mm | 85 mm |
| Colours | Black | — |
Related comparisons
vs
InFocus Crusader Challenger IN3008SLvsIrradio IR150WF
vs
InFocus Crusader Challenger IN3008SLvsViewSonic M10
5.95.6
vs
InFocus Crusader Challenger IN3008SLvsKodak Ultra
vs
InFocus Crusader Challenger IN3008SLvsFormovie Xming Page One
5.95.8
vs
InFocus Crusader Challenger IN3008SLvsWanbo X2 Max
5.95.6
vs
InFocus Crusader Challenger IN3008SLvsNebula Mars II Pro