How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Crusader Challenger IN3008SL vs NeoPix 200

InFocus Crusader Challenger IN3008SL vs Philips NeoPix 200

What Crusader Challenger IN3008SL does better (4) and where NeoPix 200 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

InFocus Crusader Challenger IN3008SL
5.9Score
4 advantages≈ US$310
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 200
Philips · 2024NeoPix 200
4.0Score
1 advantage
6.3Picture4.7

Why is Crusader Challenger IN3008SL better than NeoPix 200?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)350 lm vs 200 lm+75%
  2. Largest image size130″ vs 60″2.2×
  3. Light source life25,000 h vs 20,000 h+25%
  4. Weight1.3 kg vs 1.35 kg+4%

Why is NeoPix 200 better than Crusader Challenger IN3008SL?

  1. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)350 lm200 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10, HLG—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:11.35:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m2.99 m
Smallest image size45″24″
Largest image size130″60″
Lens shiftNoneNone
Autofocus—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)20 W—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TVAndroid (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Chromecast built-inYes—
Internal storage32 GB—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in batteryYes—
Light source life25,000 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise35 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)28 dB—
Weight1.3 kg1.35 kg
Width147 mm—
Height128 mm—
Depth130 mm—
ColoursBlackSilver, Black, White
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare