How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. IN0048SL vs NeoPix 750

InFocus IN0048SL vs Philips NeoPix 750

What IN0048SL does better (2) and where NeoPix 750 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

InFocus IN0048SL
InFocus · 2025IN0048SL
8.0Score
2 advantages≈ US$640
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 750
Philips · 2024NeoPix 750
2 advantages≈ US$610
Dimensions

Size comparison

IN0048SLNeoPix 750
313 × 23696305 × 119319
IN0048SLNeoPix 750Difference
Height236 mm119 mm+117 mm
Width313 mm305 mm+8 mm
Depth96 mm319 mm−223 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is IN0048SL better than NeoPix 750?

  1. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  2. Ethernet (LAN)Yes · NeoPix 750: No

Why is NeoPix 750 better than IN0048SL?

  1. Light source life15,000 h vs 30,000 h2×
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 14 W+40%
Specifications

Side by side

InFocus IN0048SLInFocus IN0048SL≈ US$6408.0
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPLCD (single panel)
Light sourceLamp—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,400 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)30,000:1—
3D playbackYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.13:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.47:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.5 m—
Largest image size—120″
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusNoNo
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W14 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
HDMI version1.4—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)YesNo
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption267 W—
Light source life15,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise27 dB—
Weight2.9 kg—
Width313 mm305 mm
Height236 mm119 mm
Depth96 mm319 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare