How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. IN0048SL vs Neopix 950

InFocus IN0048SL vs Philips Neopix 950

What IN0048SL does better (4) and where Neopix 950 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

InFocus IN0048SL
InFocus · 2025IN0048SL
8.0Score
4 advantages≈ US$640
Higher score
vs
Philips Neopix 950
Philips · 2025Neopix 950
7.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$620
6.9Picture3.1
6.3Setup & placement9.0
7.4Noise, lifetime & portability9.0

Why is IN0048SL better than Neopix 950?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,400 lm vs 1,400 lm3.1×
  2. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)30,000:1 vs 1,100:127.3×
  3. Ethernet (LAN)Yes · Neopix 950: No
  4. Weight2.9 kg vs 4.3 kg+48%

Why is Neopix 950 better than IN0048SL?

  1. AutofocusNo · IN0048SL: Yes
  2. Light source life15,000 h vs 30,000 h2×
Specifications

Side by side

InFocus IN0048SLInFocus IN0048SL≈ US$6408.0
Philips Neopix 950Philips Neopix 950≈ US$6207.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLP3LCD
Light sourceLampLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,400 lm1,400 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)30,000:11,100:1
3D playbackYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.13:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.47:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.5 m—
Largest image size—150″
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusNoYes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W—
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Google TV
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
HDMI version1.4—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)YesNo
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption267 W—
Light source life15,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise27 dB27 dB
Weight2.9 kg4.3 kg
Width313 mm—
Height236 mm—
Depth96 mm—
ColoursWhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare