- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Nemesis IN1028ST vs GT2000HDR
InFocus Nemesis IN1028ST vs Optoma GT2000HDR
What Nemesis IN1028ST does better (3) and where GT2000HDR wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Picture5.0
6.7Setup & placement4.3
8.2Noise, lifetime & portability7.6
Why is Nemesis IN1028ST better than GT2000HDR?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 3,500 lm+14%
- Ethernet (LAN)Yes · GT2000HDR: No
- Fan noise32 dB vs 34 dB+6%
Why is GT2000HDR better than Nemesis IN1028ST?
- Power consumption195 W vs 139 W+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,000 lm | 3,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 300,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 0.5:1 | 0.5:1 |
| Throw type | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 1.11 m | 1.11 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 30″ |
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 15 W | 15 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 195 W | 139 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 32 dB | 34 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 26 dB | 32 dB |
| Weight | — | 3 kg |
| Width | — | 274 mm |
| Height | — | 114 mm |
| Depth | — | 216 mm |
| Colours | White | White |
