How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. O2 vs X2-4KB Pro

JMGO O2 vs ViewSonic X2-4KB Pro

What O2 does better (2) and where X2-4KB Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JMGO O2
JMGO · 2025O2
8.8Score
2 advantages≈ US$2,150
Higher score
vs
ViewSonic X2-4KB Pro
ViewSonic · 2025X2-4KB Pro
5.3Score
2 advantages≈ US$2,250
6.4Picture8.1

Why is O2 better than X2-4KB Pro?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)20 W vs 12 W+67%
  2. Ethernet (LAN)Yes · X2-4KB Pro: No

Why is X2-4KB Pro better than O2?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,800 lm vs 3,300 lm+18%
  2. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications

Side by side

JMGO O2JMGO O2≈ US$2,1508.8
ViewSonic X2-4KB ProViewSonic X2-4KB Pro≈ US$2,2505.3
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method—4K by pixel shifting
Display technology—DLP
Light sourceLaserLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,800 lm3,300 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000,000:1
Lens & placement
Smallest image size—60″
Largest image size—120″
Optical zoom—1.2×
Lens shiftNone—
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)20 W12 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Internal storage64 GB—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
HDMI version—2
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)YesNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life—60,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—3.68 kg
Width—355 mm
Height—121 mm
Depth—244 mm
ColoursGrey—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare