- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs X2-4KB Pro
Acer QT12 vs ViewSonic X2-4KB Pro
What QT12 does better (1) and where X2-4KB Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Picture8.1
Why is QT12 better than X2-4KB Pro?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 3,300 lm+97%
Why is X2-4KB Pro better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Light source life6,500 h vs 60,000 h9.2×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Audio outputNo · QT12: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 3,300 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | — | 60″ |
| Largest image size | — | 120″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.2× |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 12 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| HDMI version | — | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 60,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 3.68 kg |
| Width | — | 355 mm |
| Height | — | 121 mm |
| Depth | — | 244 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
