- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- FLIK HD9 vs NeoPix 230
Kodak FLIK HD9 vs Philips NeoPix 230
What FLIK HD9 does better (1) and where NeoPix 230 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Picture2.4
2.5Setup & placement8.6
Why is FLIK HD9 better than NeoPix 230?
- Largest image size150″ vs 80″+88%
Why is NeoPix 230 better than FLIK HD9?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 250 lm+25%
- Automatic keystone correctionNo · FLIK HD9: Yes
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)800:1 vs 3,000:13.8×
- Audio outputNo · FLIK HD9: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 250 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 800:1 | 3,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.66 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 48″ |
| Largest image size | 150″ | 80″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 2.5 kg |
| Width | — | 239 mm |
| Height | — | 187 mm |
| Depth | — | 140 mm |
| Colours | — | White |
