How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. FLIK X10 vs NeoPix 450

Kodak FLIK X10 vs Philips NeoPix 450

What FLIK X10 does better (0) and where NeoPix 450 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Kodak FLIK X10
Kodak · 2025FLIK X10
0 advantages≈ US$240
vs
Philips NeoPix 450
Philips · 2025NeoPix 450
5.4Score
3 advantages≈ US$320
Higher score
5.2Setup & placement9.7

Why is FLIK X10 better than NeoPix 450?

FLIK X10 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is NeoPix 450 better than FLIK X10?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionNo · FLIK X10: Yes
  2. Audio outputNo · FLIK X10: Yes
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)800:1 vs 1,000:1+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Kodak FLIK X10Kodak FLIK X10≈ US$240
Philips NeoPix 450Philips NeoPix 450≈ US$3205.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLED—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—500 lm
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)3,000 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)800:11,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.3:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.88 m—
Smallest image size40″—
Largest image size120″—
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusYesYes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Google TV
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portNoYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life20,000 h—
Design & noise
Weight—2.48 kg
Width—195 mm
Height—219 mm
Depth—194 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare