- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- FLIK X10 vs NeoPix 530
Kodak FLIK X10 vs Philips NeoPix 530
What FLIK X10 does better (2) and where NeoPix 530 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Setup & placement2.2
Why is FLIK X10 better than NeoPix 530?
- AutofocusYes · NeoPix 530: No
- Largest image size120″ vs 100″+20%
Why is NeoPix 530 better than FLIK X10?
- Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)800:1 vs 3,000:13.8×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Audio outputNo · FLIK X10: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 3,000 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 800:1 | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.3:1 | 1.43:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.88 m | 3.17 m |
| Smallest image size | 40″ | — |
| Largest image size | 120″ | 100″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 14 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 100 W |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 2.7 kg |
| Width | — | 274 mm |
| Height | — | 107 mm |
| Depth | — | 294 mm |
| Colours | — | Black |
