How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. FLIK X10 vs Apollo P50

Kodak FLIK X10 vs ULTIMEA Apollo P50

What FLIK X10 does better (0) and where Apollo P50 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Kodak FLIK X10
Kodak · 2025FLIK X10
0 advantages≈ US$240
vs
ULTIMEA Apollo P50
ULTIMEA · 2023Apollo P50
6.0Score
4 advantages≈ US$270
Higher score
5.2Setup & placement7.2

Why is FLIK X10 better than Apollo P50?

FLIK X10 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Apollo P50 better than FLIK X10?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionNo · FLIK X10: Yes
  2. Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
  3. Audio outputNo · FLIK X10: Yes
  4. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)800:1 vs 1,500:1+88%
Specifications

Side by side

Kodak FLIK X10Kodak FLIK X10≈ US$240
ULTIMEA Apollo P50ULTIMEA Apollo P50≈ US$2706.0
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—700 lm
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)3,000 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)800:11,500:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.3:11.4:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.88 m3.1 m
Smallest image size40″120″
Largest image size120″120″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYesYes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoYes
Obstacle avoidance—Yes
Automatic screen fit—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—20 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Own / Linux platform
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
AirPlay—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portNoYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—110 W
Light source life20,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—35 dB
Weight—2.6 kg
Width—255 mm
Height—206 mm
Depth—170 mm
Colours—Grey, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare