How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. FLIK X10 vs K3

Kodak FLIK X10 vs Yaber K3

What FLIK X10 does better (0) and where K3 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Kodak FLIK X10
Kodak · 2025FLIK X10
0 advantages≈ US$240
vs
Yaber K3
Yaber · 2024K3
9.2Score
4 advantages≈ US$500
Higher score
5.2Setup & placement8.1

Why is FLIK X10 better than K3?

FLIK X10 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is K3 better than FLIK X10?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionNo · FLIK X10: Yes
  2. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)800:1 vs 15,000:118.8×
  3. Audio outputNo · FLIK X10: Yes
  4. Largest image size120″ vs 200″+67%
Specifications

Side by side

Kodak FLIK X10Kodak FLIK X10≈ US$240
Yaber K3Yaber K3≈ US$5009.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)3,000 lm1,600 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)800:115,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.3:11.2:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.88 m2.66 m
Smallest image size40″40″
Largest image size120″200″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYesYes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—36 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Google TV
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portNoYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life20,000 h—
Design & noise
Weight—5.1 kg
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare