- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Luma 150 vs Apollo
Kodak Luma 150 vs Nebula Apollo
What Luma 150 does better (0) and where Apollo wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is Luma 150 better than Apollo?
Luma 150 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Apollo better than Luma 150?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)150 lm vs 200 lm+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | — |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | — |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 150 lm | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,500:1 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.39:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.08 m |
| Largest image size | 150″ | — |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | — |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | No | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | — | Yes |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 30 dB |
| Weight | — | 0.58 kg |
| Width | — | 65 mm |
| Height | — | 131 mm |
| Depth | — | 65 mm |
