- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Luma 150 vs NeoPix Easy
Kodak Luma 150 vs Philips NeoPix Easy
What Luma 150 does better (1) and where NeoPix Easy wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Picture6.5
Why is Luma 150 better than NeoPix Easy?
- Largest image size150″ vs 80″+88%
Why is NeoPix Easy better than Luma 150?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)150 lm vs 2,600 lm17.3×
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:1 vs 3,000:12×
- Audio outputNo · Luma 150: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 150 lm | 2,600 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,500:1 | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.4:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.1 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 24″ |
| Largest image size | 150″ | 80″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 4 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 0.86 kg |
| Width | — | 207 mm |
| Height | — | 84 mm |
| Depth | — | 150 mm |
| Colours | — | Silver, Black |
