- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Luma 150 vs PicoPix Micro
Kodak Luma 150 vs Philips PicoPix Micro
What Luma 150 does better (2) and where PicoPix Micro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Picture3.4
Why is Luma 150 better than PicoPix Micro?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:1 vs 500:13×
- Largest image size150″ vs 80″+88%
Why is PicoPix Micro better than Luma 150?
- Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Audio outputNo · Luma 150: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 150 lm | 150 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,500:1 | 500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | 150″ | 80″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Own / Linux platform |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
