- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Luma 350 vs Luma 500
Kodak Luma 350 vs Kodak Luma 500
What Luma 350 does better (1) and where Luma 500 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is Luma 350 better than Luma 500?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)350 lm vs 150 lm2.3×
Why is Luma 500 better than Luma 350?
- Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 350 lm | 150 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 400:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 0.57:1 |
| Throw type | — | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 1.26 m |
| Largest image size | 200″ | — |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 500 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.73 kg | — |
| Colours | White | Black |
