- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Luma 350 vs PicoPix Micro 2TV
Kodak Luma 350 vs Philips PicoPix Micro 2TV
What Luma 350 does better (2) and where PicoPix Micro 2TV wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Picture2.5
Why is Luma 350 better than PicoPix Micro 2TV?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)350 lm vs 200 lm+75%
- Largest image size200″ vs 100″2×
Why is PicoPix Micro 2TV better than Luma 350?
- Audio outputNo · Luma 350: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 350 lm | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 600:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.66 m |
| Largest image size | 200″ | 100″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | — | Yes |
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.73 kg | — |
| Colours | White | Black |
