- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Luma 350 vs Luma 75
Kodak Luma 350 vs Kodak Luma 75
What Luma 350 does better (2) and where Luma 75 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is Luma 350 better than Luma 75?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)350 lm vs 75 lm4.7×
- Largest image size200″ vs 80″2.5×
Why is Luma 75 better than Luma 350?
- Weight0.73 kg vs 0.14 kg5.2×
- Audio outputNo · Luma 350: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | — |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | — |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 350 lm | 75 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,300:1 |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | 200″ | 80″ |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 4 W |
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 30 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 16 dB |
| Weight | 0.73 kg | 0.14 kg |
| Width | — | 80 mm |
| Height | — | 20 mm |
| Depth | — | 80 mm |
| Colours | White | White, Silver |
